CLP Publishing
CLP ONLINE LIBRARY
OE SHOW
IOPTICS
abc
Main > Advanced Photonics >  Volume 1 >  Issue 3 >  Page 036001 > Article
  • Figures
  • Abstract
  • Figures (5)
  • Tables (0)
  • Equations (0)
  • References (51)
  • Get PDF
  • View Full Text
  • Paper Information

    • Received: Apr. 14, 2019

    Accepted: Jun. 1, 2019

    Posted: Jun. 19, 2019

    Published Online: Jun. 19, 2019

    The Author Email: Setzpfandt Frank (f.setzpfandt@uni-jena.de)

    DOI: 10.1117/1.AP.1.3.036001

  • Get Citation
    • Copy Citation Text

    Chunqi Jin, Mina Afsharnia, René Berlich, Stefan Fasold, Chengjun Zou, Dennis Arslan, Isabelle Staude, Thomas Pertsch, Frank Setzpfandt. Dielectric metasurfaces for distance measurements and three-dimensional imaging[J]. Advanced Photonics, 2019, 1(3): 036001

    Download Citation

  • Category
    • Research Articles
  • Share
(a) Scheme showing the creation of a DH-PSF by using a phase mask with the phase profile shown in (b). (c) Intensity distribution in the image plane of the lens for different distances between the point light source and the phase mask.

Fig. 1. (a) Scheme showing the creation of a DH-PSF by using a phase mask with the phase profile shown in (b). (c) Intensity distribution in the image plane of the lens for different distances between the point light source and the phase mask.

Download full sizeView in Article

Phase profiles for realizing a DH-PSF with (a) 4 and (b) 10 evenly spaced phase steps. (c) Intensity profile of ideal DH-PSF, where the main parameters are indicated. (d)–(g) Comparison of parameters of ideal and discretized PSFs dependent on the distance D between the point light source and the phase mask. The plots show the difference between the values for ideal and discretized realizations for (d) the rotation angle Θ, (e) the distance L, (f) the horizontal width Δx, and (g) the vertical width Δy.

Fig. 2. Phase profiles for realizing a DH-PSF with (a) 4 and (b) 10 evenly spaced phase steps. (c) Intensity profile of ideal DH-PSF, where the main parameters are indicated. (d)–(g) Comparison of parameters of ideal and discretized PSFs dependent on the distance D between the point light source and the phase mask. The plots show the difference between the values for ideal and discretized realizations for (d) the rotation angle Θ, (e) the distance L, (f) the horizontal width Δx, and (g) the vertical width Δy.

Download full sizeView in Article

(a) Sketch of the considered geometry of the metasurface consisting of silicon nanodisks embedded in a medium with a refractive index of n=1.45. Numerical calculations of (b) the transmittance intensity and (c) phase of silicon nanodisk arrays with varying radius and lattice periodicity. The operation wavelength is 1500 nm. (d), (e) Transmission phase of metasurfaces with parameters along the white dashed lines in (b) and (c).

Fig. 3. (a) Sketch of the considered geometry of the metasurface consisting of silicon nanodisks embedded in a medium with a refractive index of n=1.45. Numerical calculations of (b) the transmittance intensity and (c) phase of silicon nanodisk arrays with varying radius and lattice periodicity. The operation wavelength is 1500 nm. (d), (e) Transmission phase of metasurfaces with parameters along the white dashed lines in (b) and (c).

Download full sizeView in Article

(a) SEM image of realized silicon metasurface before covering with spin-on-glass. The scale bar is 2 μm. (b) Photograph of the finished sample with the 16 fabricated phase masks of 1-cm diameter. (c) Measured phase profile in the center of a phase mask with 10 phase levels.

Fig. 4. (a) SEM image of realized silicon metasurface before covering with spin-on-glass. The scale bar is 2  μm. (b) Photograph of the finished sample with the 16 fabricated phase masks of 1-cm diameter. (c) Measured phase profile in the center of a phase mask with 10 phase levels.

Download full sizeView in Article

(a) Measured DH-PSF. (b) Rotation angle of the DH-PSF in dependence on the source-sample distance D, the insets show two specific orientations of the DH-PSF. (c) Photograph of a 3-D scene. (d) Raw image that was taken using the phase mask and (e) retrieved depth information.

Fig. 5. (a) Measured DH-PSF. (b) Rotation angle of the DH-PSF in dependence on the source-sample distance D, the insets show two specific orientations of the DH-PSF. (c) Photograph of a 3-D scene. (d) Raw image that was taken using the phase mask and (e) retrieved depth information.

Download full sizeView in Article

Please Enter Your Email:

| Registration