Fig. 1. (a) S-on-1 probability curves of 532 nm HR coatings, (b) and (c) are the evolution of LIDT and 100% damage probability threshold versus shot number.
Fig. 2. Damage morphologies for (a)–(c) fluence of at 532 nm, (d) at 1064 nm in one-on-one mode tested by optical microscopy.
Fig. 3. SEM micrographs of the damage sites shown in Figs. 2(a)–2(c).
Fig. 4. SEM micrograph of the damage site shown in Fig. 2(a).
Fig. 5. Damage morphologies for fluence of (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) at shot number .
Fig. 6. Depth information of the plasma scald area for the damage site shown in Fig. 2(a). The probe of the step profiler moves along the white line.
Fig. 7. AFM section analysis and SEM micrograph of damage at for .
Fig. 8. Surface profiler of the damage sites at fluence for shot number .
Fig. 9. The FIB micrograph of the 532 nm HR coatings.
Fig. 10. Damage morphologies for (a) , and (b) , , tested by optical microscopy and SEM.
Fig. 11. The AFM section analysis of the damage site shown in Fig. 10(a).