Main > Laser & Optoelectronics Progress >  Volume 58 >  Issue 2 >  Page 0200003 > Article
  • Abstract
  • Abstract
  • View Summary
  • Figures (2)
  • Tables (5)
  • Equations (0)
  • References (40)
  • Get PDF(in Chinese)
  • Paper Information
  • Received: Jun. 1, 2020

    Accepted: Jul. 7, 2020

    Posted: Jan. 1, 2021

    Published Online: Jan. 11, 2021

    The Author Email: Yu Mei (yumei2@126.com)

    DOI: 10.3788/LOP202158.0200003

  • Get Citation
  • Copy Citation Text

    Yaoyao Lin, Mei Yu, Zhouyan He, Gangyi Jiang. Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(2): 0200003

    Download Citation

  • Category
  • Reviews
  • Share
Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Vol. 58, Issue 2, 0200003 (2021)

Objective Quality Assessment for Three-Dimensional Meshes

Lin Yaoyao1, Yu Mei1,2,*, He Zhouyan1, and Jiang Gangyi1,2

Author Affiliations

  • 1Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China

Abstract

With the wide applications of three-dimensional (3D) meshes in digital entertainment, television animation, virtual reality, and other fields, there are more and more processing techniques for 3D meshes, including compression, simplification, watermarking, and denoising. These processing techniques will inevitably lead to various distortions in 3D meshes. Therefore, how to preferably evaluate the visual quality of 3D meshes becomes an urgent problem to be solved at present. This paper reviews the objective quality assessment methods for 3D meshes developed during the past 20 years. First, some technical indexes for 3D mesh quality assessment and several public databases are introduced. Second, the quality assessment methods for existing typical three-dimensional meshes are classified, and their respective characteristics are introduced. Then, the typical algorithms introduced in the commonly used databases are tested and compared. Finally, the objective quality assessment methods of 3D meshes are summarized and prospected.

keywords

Please Enter Your Email: